The Multi-Club Dilemma Facing Michelle Kang’s Empire
- Sophie Hurst
- 3 hours ago
- 4 min read

A few years ago, the idea of London City Lionesses becoming a genuine Women's Champions League (UWCL) contender felt a long way off. Promotion to the WSL was the immediate goal, establishing themselves in the top flight the next challenge, and anything beyond that seemed firmly in the future.
Fast forward to today and the conversation already feels very different. The arrivals of players like Jana Fernández, Grace Geyoro and Delphine Cascarino have sent a clear message about the level London City Lionesses are aiming for, while rumours linking the club with players such as Alexia Putellas and Mary Earps have only added to the growing sense that this is not a club interested in taking small steps. Michelle Kang’s ambition is clear; she wants them competing with the very best.

The irony is that if that vision becomes reality, UEFA has already created a roadblock.
The other week, UEFA's head of women's football, Nadine Kessler, confirmed that clubs operating under the same ownership structure will not be permitted to compete in the Women's Champions League, insisting that sporting integrity must remain protected - a rule that has been in place in the men’s side of the game for decades:
"Why would we want to preserve the sporting integrity of men's football, but not of women's football? It's out of the question. In any sport you want to preserve sporting integrity, that's the most important thing."
It’s a point that is difficult to disagree with. The thought of two clubs, owned by the same person, competing in the same elite European tournament has always felt uncomfortable. Supporters need to believe that every club acts independently, that recruitment is made in their own singular interest, and that no team is a feeder for another.

Whilst UEFA drawing a line makes complete sense, it forces an immediate question about Kang's multi-club model, and where her true priorities lie.
Who Takes Priority? The Crown Jewel v The Future
On paper, French powerhouse OL Lyonnes, remains the crown jewel of Kang's portfolio. They’re eight-time European champions and a dominant team in Europe. Yet, coming off a heavy 4-0 defeat to Barcelona in the Champions League final, and every growing London City Lionesses transfer rumours, there feels a slight shift in Kang’s priorities.
The reality is that the WSL has become the league everyone wants to be part of. Football is inherently a pillar of English culture, so it’s no wonder the WSL does so well here; the audiences are bigger, the commercial opportunities are greater and the level of competition is arguably stronger than anywhere else in the world. England has become the centre of the women's football conversation, and investors know it.
This is exactly where London City Lionesses come in. Unlike the vast majority of WSL sides, they do not operate as an extension of a men’s institution. Instead, they’re an independent women's club backed by a billionaire whose sole focus is women’s sport.Â

Kang's ultimate goal appears to be building London City Lionesses into the ‘Barcelona of the WSL.’ And, of course, her finances add a huge bonus and privilege to any players they might want, or want to keep on. When Trinity Rodman was rumoured to be making the move to the top WSL clubs recently, Kang broke the records by handing Rodman a historic, million-dollar-plus salary to stay at Washington Spirit.
That level of financial privilege makes it incredibly difficult for standard, self-sustaining clubs to compete, which inevitably threatens to create an elite imbalance. But, it's difficult to criticise an owner for throwing millions at a sport that has spent decades begging for exactly that type of aggressive backing.
A Proactive Strike by UEFA
Michelle Kang is not an isolated case, as multi-club ownerships become more and more popular in women’s football. Take investor groups like Mercury 13, who have acquired stakes in Bristol City, Como, and Levante Badalona. While those specific projects aren't yet operating at a European-qualification level, the direction of travel for the entire sport is clear.Â
Women's football is facing some of the same questions men's football has spent decades trying to answer. The difference is that the women's game still has the opportunity to tackle them before they become deeply embedded in the sport.
That is why UEFA's announcement feels so significant. It doesn’t affect London City Lionesses right now, and it doesn’t suddenly change Lyon's place in European football. What it does do is create a very clear problem if Michelle Kang's long-term plan succeeds.

If London City Lionesses establish themselves as a Champions League club, UEFA's rules mean both clubs cannot compete in the competition under the same ownership. At that point, something has to give. Whether that means a sale, a restructuring of ownership or another solution remains to be seen.
What makes the situation particularly interesting is where Kang appears to be placing her focus. The investment in London City Lionesses has been impossible to ignore, from major signings to the club's wider ambitions. Combined with the commercial power of the WSL, it’s hard not to view London City as one of the most exciting projects in women's football.
The question now is whether that project eventually becomes so successful that it forces a choice between London and Lyon.
-3.png)